Picking High-Growth Companies: How to Find the Next Apple

Picking High-Growth Companies: How to Find the Next Apple
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, February 17, 2012: Issue #1711

Apple’s share price exceeded $500 this week, giving it the largest market cap of any U.S. company.

Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) so successfully sells computers, phones and other electronic gadgets that recently announced fourth-quarter profits soared 118% on a 73% increase in revenue. This is unheard of for a $475-billion company.

To put this in perspective, earnings at the companies in the S&P 500 stock index are on track to post a 6.6% year-on-year rise for the fourth quarter. Yet once Apple’s earnings are factored out, the expected fourth-quarter gain shrivels to just 2.8%. This so skews results that many Wall Street analysts are now stripping Apple from the index before weighing valuations and making forecasts.

Of course, it’s just a matter of time before Apple’s torrid growth begins to wane. It’s not possible for $500-billion companies to keep growing at the rate of $5-billion companies… or even $50-billion companies.

So the key is to search for the next Apple. But how do you find it?

Fortunately, the factors that make a great-performing stock are well known and have been intensively studied by academics and researchers. We know the key characteristics that top-performing stocks generally possess before making their parabolic moves up.

Here are just a few:

1. Double-digit sales growth. You can only grow the bottom line for so long by cutting costs. Every business needs to have healthy top-line growth before it can generate robust and sustainable long-term earnings growth. Note that sales at Apple jumped 73% last quarter.
2. At least 25% quarterly earnings growth. In an economy as weak as this one, most companies can’t meet these first two hurdles. But, again, Apple is seeing earnings growth at more than four times this rate.
3. A return on equity of 17% or more. Return on equity – an excellent measure of management’s efficiency with capital – is calculated by dividing earnings per share by book value per share. (This is one of Warren Buffett’s key metrics, too.) Note that Apple’s return on equity is a whopping 46%.
4. New products and services. Apple is the king of innovation, regularly bringing out not just new versions of products but entirely new products: iPods, iTunes, iPhones and iPads.
5. High-quality management. Never forget that every company is essentially a team of people. And just as every great sports franchise needs a highly qualified coach, so does each company require a visionary leader. Apple’s co-founder and former CEO Steve Jobs was one of the greats. Now that he’s gone, it will be interesting to see how the new management performs.
6. Institutional support. The vast majority of shares traded on the major exchanges are mutual funds, hedge funds, pension plans and endowments. You want to own the same stocks the institutions are buying. And, indeed, institutions own more than 70% of Apple’s outstanding shares.

These are some of the key criteria that companies need to meet to generate superior long-term returns for shareholders.

We may not see another company in our lifetimes that transforms the business landscape the way Apple has. But there are plenty of great innovators out there, including Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN), Google (Nasdaq: GOOG), Genentech, eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY), Costco (Nasdaq: COST) and Intuitive Surgical (Nasdaq: ISRG).

These companies – and others like them – are likely to be among the best-performing stocks in the years ahead.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

World’s Most Contrarian Investment

World’s Most Contrarian Investment
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, February 13, 2012: Issue #1707

How do you identify great contrarian investment opportunities?

Two ways. First, rather than limiting yourself to your national borders, you seek out opportunities worldwide. Next, you insist on two essential factors: abject pessimism and extreme valuations. That’s exactly what we have in European stocks today.

Ask your friends and neighbors which stocks in Europe they’re buying right now and they’ll ask you to sit down so they can feel your forehead. After all, no one in his right mind would buy stocks in a region where socialist policies reign, economic growth is almost nonexistent and the currency – the euro – is coming apart at the seams, right?

Wrong. The fact that almost no one is enthusiastic about Europe right now – indeed, most see it as a ticking time bomb – tells you that sentiment is entirely negative.

How about valuations? Those are compelling, too. The benchmark MSCI Europe Index, for example, currently sells for just 9.8 times estimated 2012 earnings, versus an average of 17 times earnings over the past 25 years. Plus, the drop in prices has boosted the dividends on many of the well-known global companies based in Europe.

Lower Values, Higher Dividends…

In sum, you have low valuations, high dividends and extremely negative sentiment. Yet the vast majority of investors reading these words won’t plunk a dime in these markets. (And, if history is any guide, a year or two from now they’ll scratch their heads and say they just can’t fathom how European stocks could have rallied so strongly.)

Not that buying contrarian investments in this troubled region doesn’t present some risks. After all, the European Central Bank (ECB) is propping up troubled banks. Many Eurozone countries are teetering on the brink of recession. And there’s a decided lack of bold political leadership in the region.

But the good news is that all these factors are already well known and fully priced into European stocks. (That’s why they’re so darn cheap.) Meanwhile, the U.S. economy has stabilized – reducing a big risk to the global economy – and the ECB has at least addressed liquidity problems at the banks.

Plus, a weaker euro is actually boosting the earnings prospects for the many companies that export to other parts of the world where economic growth (and currencies) are stronger.

Prime examples are:

• Siemens AG (NYSE: SI),
• Nestle (Pink: NSRGY),
• Novartis (NYSE: NVS), and
• BMW (OTC: BAMXY.PK).

So how do you play this contrarian investment opportunity? One of the best ways is with a low-cost, Europe-focused ETF like the Vanguard MSCI Europe Fund (NYSE: VGK). It’s easily the least expensive ETF in the sector with annual expenses of just .14%.

Companies in the U.K. account for around 34% of VGK’s assets, while France, Germany and Switzerland make up approximately 40%. The fund holds more than 450 stocks, but a quarter of its $2.4-billion portfolio is in its top 10 holdings, which include Vodafone, Royal Dutch Shell and HSBC Holdings. You’ll earn a 4.4% dividend here.

If you want to benefit even more from a potential slingshot recovery in these markets, try the WisdomTree Europe SmallCap Dividend Fund (NYSE: DFE). It keeps a third of its assets in smaller British companies and the rest in small-cap stocks in the Eurozone.

Remember, when an equity market rallies, the small-cap issues generally outperform larger stocks. And your contrarian investment will get a whopping 5.8% dividend here.

So there you have it, two great ways to play one of the most compelling opportunities in the world right now. Of course, most investors simply cannot bring themselves to invest against the herd. That’s how they got stuck in internet stocks a decade ago and residential real estate five years ago.

It’s also why this is perhaps one of the best contrarian investment opportunities today.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

The Ultimate Alternative Investment?

The Ultimate Alternative Investment?
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, February 10, 2012: Issue #1706

Last week I spoke at an investment conference at Rancho Santana, a charming resort community on the Pacific coast of Nicaragua, near the town of San Juan del Sur.

Set on more than two miles of coastline with rolling hills and dramatic cliffs, the reserve attracts expats, investors, surfers and nature lovers from all over the world. They like the idea of owning a piece of – or at least visiting – one of the most spectacular stretches of coastal land in the world.

Some are attracted because the property is so inexpensive. It’s hard to believe you can buy a stunning home site directly on the Pacific Ocean for less than $175,000.

And it’s not just the property that’s inexpensive. One evening 14 of us rode into town to have dinner at a favorite local restaurant, Yolanda’s. The proprietor served up heaping helpings of local lobster, fresh vegetables, black beans and rice, plantains and plenty of Corona beer. When I picked up the tab, I was shocked. The cost was less than $9 a person.

Some investors here are banking on increased foreign investment and commercial development. The International Monetary Fund estimates that Nicaragua’s economic growth hit 4% last year… and is on the verge of accelerating.

Exports jumped 23% last year. Tourism is up. MSN Money ranked Nicaragua at the top of their list of “Ten Exotic Retirement Spots for 2011,” telling readers “[Now] is the time to put this country at the top of your super-cheap overseas retirement list.” CNN Money calls it “the next Costa Rica.” Indeed, Rancho Santana is just 50 miles north of the Costa Rican border.

Good things are happening locally, too. A local business leader plans to invest $300 million next door in a world-class marina, golf and spa resort called Guacalito. Due to open in Spring 2013, it’s located just 30 minutes from Rancho Santana and is already bringing increased investment and improved infrastructure to the region. And an international airport is planned for the Tola area, located less than a half hour away.

Other investors are putting money to work here for privacy reasons. They want to diversify their portfolios beyond the prying hands of angry ex-spouses or potential litigants.

But for most, it’s the sheer beauty of the place. The New York Times points out that, “The beaches are among the finest in the Americas, and among the least developed.” Gaze out from atop one of the many bluffs on this 2,700-acre reserve and you’ll see what the coast of California looked like a hundred years ago, pristine and largely undeveloped.

Residential lots are selling quickly. Over 50 homes have been built and 24 more are under construction. It’s not hard to see why. The terrain is such that home sites can capture views of the ocean, the nearby valley and lovely sunsets. Labor costs are significantly lower here. And a master association and various sub-associations exist so that owners are assured that high and consistent standards of quality are maintained.

Is oceanfront property in Nicaragua the ultimate alternative investment? That’s for you to decide. But if you’d like to learn more, feel free to visit the website or, better yet, sign up for a property tour.

The cost is $500 per person ($600 per couple) and includes all transportation, breakfast and three nights in oceanfront accommodations at Rancho Santana. This is a great trip for those wanting to come down and investigate investment, second home or retirement opportunities. (Contact Bryan McMandon.)

In the interest of full disclosure, Rancho Santana is being developed, in part, by colleagues of mine at Agora Publishing. However, I am not compensated in any way (directly or indirectly) for any sales at the development. I just think it’s a beautiful place and an interesting investment.

And whether you decide to invest or not, I know you’d enjoy the experience.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

The Best Investment You Can Make In Four Minutes

The Best Investment You Can Make In Four Minutes

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, February 6, 2012: Issue #1702

What if you could reach total financial independence in just four minutes a day?

If that sounds unrealistic, stay tuned. Because in the weeks ahead, our panel of experts at Investment U is going to show you exactly how it’s done.  Best of all, it won’t cost you a dime. After all, this service is free.

It’s a shame, really, that the average person graduates from high school and still doesn’t truly understand compound interest, or adjustable-rate mortgages or what a 401(k) is. Far fewer still know how to navigate the world’s treacherous but lucrative financial markets.

Since financial literacy and advanced money management skills aren’t taught in school, many men and women follow a predictable path when it comes to investing.

First, realizing they don’t know enough to risk their saving without potentially making huge mistakes, they turn to a stockbroker, insurance agent or mutual fund salesman for advice.

Not good.  Many people in the financial industry are peddling advice that is pedestrian, self-serving, far too expensive or all three.  Expect to hear these folks tell you, for example, that full-load mutual funds, whole life insurance and high-cost variable annuities are the best things since night baseball.

After a few years, the typical customer realizes that he’s dealing not with a fiduciary but a salesman – and a primary reason he’s not doing well is that his broker is doing too well.

That’s when many investors make their next predictable move. They transfer their account to a discount broker like E-Trade or Charles Schwab.

And while a discounter is a whole lot cheaper than a full-service broker, it quickly becomes apparent that the customer isn’t a professional money manager himself and – truth be told – really doesn’t know that much about what he’s doing.

The typical discount customer ends up with a few winners and a few losers, but doesn’t know when to sell them or why. At the end of the year, he looks at his statement and sees he isn’t much closer to his financial goals – if, indeed, he ever took the time to set any.

This brings many investors (older, wiser and generally poorer) to the conclusion that they do need qualified help, just not from a salesman in a transaction-based relationship.

Eventually, hundreds of thousands of investors turn to Investment U, the free, Web-based source for men and women seeking to achieve and maintain total financial freedom.

Proven Principles Don’t Change

We do something virtually no one else does. Investment U provides daily commentary and analysis about today’s fast-moving financial markets, but always with the objective of tying our advice to timeless investment principles.

Economies expand and contract. Currencies rise and fall. Governments come and go. Markets zig and zag. But proven investment principles don’t change.

Yet the sad fact is that most investors have never learned them. They’re trying to ace Trigonometry without having mastered Algebra 1. Why don’t you have the crucial knowledge you need?  Because schools don’t teach it and telling the unvarnished truth isn’t conducive to selling high-priced financial products.

As Vanguard founder John Bogle likes to say, “It’s amazing how difficult it is for a man to understand something if he’s paid a small fortune not to understand it.”

We don’t have conflicts like that here. We don’t charge commissions or fees. We don’t want to “capture your assets.”

Yes, Investment U offers premium services to subscribers. (We couldn’t support a free e-letter forever if we didn’t.) But there is never any obligation to buy and any purchase comes with a free-trial period and a money-back guarantee.

So stick with us. In the weeks ahead, we are going to reveal big dividend plays, high-yield bonds, undervalued currencies, ultra-cheap commodities, risk-reduction techniques, and proven strategies to prevent losses, protect gains and navigate today’s volatile investment environment.

Best of all, we’re going to do all this with a single goal in mind: To show you the shortest, most direct route to total financial independence.

The only commitment it requires from you is four minutes a day. That’s how long it takes the average reader to finish our daily column.

The service is free. But the knowledge is priceless.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Investing in Alternative Assets

Investing in Alternative Assets

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, February 3, 2012: Issue #1701

Rarely have Americans faced a more challenging investment landscape.

Bonds yield next to nothing. Money markets pay literally nothing. Residential real estate is swamped in a flood of short sales and foreclosures. Gold – after climbing six-fold over the last 12 years – may have topped out. And stocks are gyrating madly.

Given all this, where does the prudent investor put his money to work?

That’s what I asked Rick Pfeifer, an Oxford Club Pillar One Advisor and Senior Portfolio Manager with Fund Advisors of America, a Maitland, Florida-based money management firm, in a recent interview:

Q: Rick, the typical investor is disgusted with the yields on bonds and cash and scared to death of the stock market. What are you saying to clients?

A: I’m telling them that now is an excellent time to take a portion of their portfolio and diversify into alternative assets: convertible bonds, preferred shares, foreign currencies, hedge positions, ultra-cheap commodities and so on.

Q: Okay, let’s take these one at a time. What are you buying now and why?

A: We recently launched a managed account for individual investors that we call The Global Hedge Portfolio. The idea is not to replace your traditional stock and bond portfolio, but to offer a complement to it. We’re seeking profits in investments that don’t move in lockstep with either the S&P 500 or Lehman’s Treasury Index.

Q: Give me a couple of “for-instances.”

A: Take the situation in the Eurozone, for example. We see European leaders and the European Central bank doing a whole lot of talking, but we don’t see genuine, concrete steps toward solving the huge fiscal problems in Southern Europe. Some might even argue that the reason they haven’t yet taken serious corrective steps is because their options are so limited. Italy, for example, is simply too big an economy to bail out, in my view. My co-strategist Greg Galloway and I forecast that the euro will fall to parity with the dollar within 12 months. So we are short the euro in our Global Hedge Portfolio.

Q: Can’t fault your thinking there. I’ve been saying much the same thing for months now. What else are you doing?

A: We’re investing in overlooked asset classes with plenty of upside potential. Take timber, for example. Over the long run, investments in timber have beaten stocks by about 4% annually – and with considerably less volatility. Plus, timber is uncorrelated to stocks, making it an excellent way to balance your portfolio. One timber trust we own is seeing revenue grow 23% annually. Operating margins top 24%. And we’re getting a 3.5% dividend yield, too.

Q: What else are you buying?

A: We’re finding bargains in certain international markets, particularly Asia and Latin America. Because domestic demand there is growing, these areas are largely immune to problems here at home and in the Eurozone. For example, we’re buying an Asian auto manufacturer that’s selling for just half of annual sales. It’s trading at a substantial discount to book and should easily triple its earnings this year. We’re also picking up undervalued oil assets in Brazil, high-yielding energy trusts in Canada, a high-quality wine maker in Chile and the world’s leading food company, denominated in Swiss francs.

Q: How about metals?

A: We’re not buying commodities directly. Instead, we’re buying metal producers that appear undervalued and have big dividends attached.

Q: What about gold?

A: I don’t know what gold is going to do and I don’t think anyone else knows, either. But some gold producers are selling at mouth-watering prices right now, even if gold goes nowhere. One of our favorites yields 10% right now. If gold takes off, great. But if it moves sideways for a while, a 10% yield makes it a comfortable wait.

Q: What if gold moves south?

A: We run trailing stops on our investment positions. That gives us unlimited upside potential with strictly limited downside risk.

Q: Anything else you really like?

A: Quite a few things, really. I’ll mention one. Residential real estate is a mess, not only in the United States but in many overseas markets, as well. But we’re finding real bargains in commercial real estate in select overseas markets. Of course, we’re not buying the buildings themselves. Our investments are totally liquid. And, in addition to potential share price appreciation here, some of the assets are currently yielding more than 7%.

Q: Good to know, Rick. And an excellent reminder that for investors who are willing to invest worldwide, there are always opportunities available somewhere. Thanks for sharing your thoughts with us today, Rick.

A: Any time. It’s my pleasure.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Healthcare: The Hottest Stock Market Sector in 2012

Healthcare: The Hottest Stock Market Sector in 2012

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 30, 2012: Issue #1696

Too many investors are focused on high unemployment, weak economic growth, problems in the Eurozone and runaway deficit spending. They seldom note the positives, including low inflation, rock-bottom interest rates, falling food and energy prices (coal and natural gas), expanding opportunities in emerging markets, low valuations and – not least of all – all-time record corporate profits.

So don’t let the doomsayers get you down. There are always opportunities out there, even during the most difficult economic times.

The Healthcare Sector in 2012

In particular, I see the planets aligning for medical technology right now. Why? Baby Boomers are moving into their golden years (and will soon need more healthcare services). Product innovation is continuing apace. Hospitals and clinics are busy upgrading their technology to cut costs, increase safety and minimize errors. And the healthcare sector is less sensitive to the vagaries of the business cycle.

Let me use just one example from my Oxford Trading Portfolio: Cerner Corp. (Nasdaq: CERN).

Cerner makes systems that automate records in hospitals and doctors’ offices. This is much more efficient than handwritten notes. It’s also much safer.

Automation reduces errors. Doctors – famous for illegible handwriting – can cause the wrong drug to be inadvertently dispensed at a hospital or pharmacy. They can forget to renew old prescriptions. Cerner prevents that.

The company is also a leader in billing software, with a much wider range of offerings than any of its competitors. For example, its scalable Millennium software is already installed in more than 9,000 hospitals, pharmacies and doctors’ offices. And a new federal push for records automation will only increase that footprint.

Paper records can be easily lost, stolen, misplaced, or destroyed in a fire. That doesn’t benefit the doctor or the insurance company – and certainly not the patient.

The whole world is going digital and the healthcare sector has lagged behind for too long. Digital medical records are safer, better organized, more accessible and less susceptible to human error. Whenever I see an opportunity this big, I know huge profits are just around the corner.

$4-Trillion Influx

Cerner is just one of many healthcare stocks that promise huge capital gains in the weeks and months ahead. And my colleague Marc Lichtenfeld, Editor of FirstLine Investor Alert, has uncovered dozens more.

FirstLine aims to profit from the $4 trillion that’s going to flood the healthcare sector over the coming years. Thanks to nearly four million Baby Boomers turning 65 every year, companies involved in biotech, genomics, regenerative medicine, medical technology and personalized medicine will soon experience explosive growth.

In a recent chat with Marc, he told me about four companies in particular that have huge upside potential right now.

The first is a firm poised to take advantage of the frenzy in the hepatitis C space. Investors have seen buyout premiums of 89% and 163% in the past two months. Plus, in April, the company is expected to have the first drug approved that addresses the cause of a very serious disease, rather than just the symptoms.

The second is an emerging leader in regenerative medicine. In early clinical trials, its treatments produce dramatic improvements in patients with chronic heart disease. If approved, this procedure would both save both lives and millions of healthcare dollars.

The third is a small firm with a drug that nearly doubles the survival of patients with an aggressive cancer, with few side effects.

The last – and potentially the biggest opportunity – is a company that reads the DNA of cancer tumors. This helps doctors determine the proper course of treatment, allowing the patient to avoid chemotherapy.

Look Beyond Negative Headlines

I can’t emphasize strongly enough how important it is for investors today to look beyond all the negative political and economic headlines and focus on companies that are set to knock the ball out of the park for shareholders.

When Willie Sutton was asked why he robbed banks, he answered simply, “Because that’s where the money is.” For the very same reason, you should invest in the fastest growing companies in the healthcare sector today.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Does Low Volatility Put Your Portfolio At Risk?

Does Low Volatility Put Your Portfolio At Risk?

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, January 27, 2012: Issue #1695

The stock market gyrated so wildly in 2011 that many investors finally threw in the towel.

How else can we read the massive equity fund redemptions that occurred in the second half of last year?

But, apparently, the market has taken its anti-anxiety medication. After last year’s gut-wrenching swings, U.S. stocks have been surprisingly tranquil. For 13 straight days, the Dow has moved up or down less than 100 points.

This is good news for bullish traders and bad news for those who have been making money trading the VIX. Let me explain…

The VIX is the ticker symbol for the CBOE Market Volatility Index, a popular measure of volatility in S&P 500 index options. According to The Wall Street Journal, this so-called “fear gauge” has fallen 20% to levels unseen in six months.

Why? One reason is that the U.S. economy appears to be getting back on its feet. Despite all the pessimism in the Eurozone, U.S. corporations are busy reporting yet another quarter of all-time record profits. (Just how long will mom-and-pop investors ignore this salient point?)

The Dow is up almost 500 points for the month. Fund companies report that money is flowing back into equities again. Yet the calm makes some investors nervous. I hear many analysts crying out that the market is about to plunge again.

Deluded, Ignorant, or Both

Let’s start with the straightforward declaration that anyone who claims to know “what the market is going to do next” is, by definition, someone who is ignorant, deluded, or both. The market will rise or fall next week or next month based on next week’s or next month’s news. Yesterday’s news has already been discounted. (As Legg Mason’s Bill Miller likes to say, “If it’s in the papers, in the price.)

Moreover, there’s no historical evidence to show that a market pause generally precedes a correction. And the data go back pretty far.

For example, market analyst Mark Hulbert has loaded the Dow’s daily returns – all the way back to its creation in 1896 – into his statistical software. For each trade date since, he calculated the Dow’s trailing volatility and then looked to see if the stock market performed any different following periods of low volatility than it did at all other times.

The short answer? Nope. He came up empty. Perhaps that’s the reason for the old Wall Street saw: “Never sell a dull market short.”

There are two things to conclude here:

• The hair-raising volatility that made trading (going long) the VIX like taking a tootsie roll from a toddler is over, at least for now…
• The other important takeaway is that traders and investors have no historical reason to believe that the recent pause portends a market downturn ahead.

Sure, a spike in oil prices, a hedge fund blow-up or a nasty surprise from across the pond could change that in a nanosecond. But bolts out of the blue are just one of the many short-term hazards of trading and investing.

For now, the market is taking a breather. But that doesn’t mean it isn’t about to get a second wind.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Everything You Need to Know about Insider Trading

by Insider Alert Research Team

Insider trading.

You might have heard the term back in 2011 when Peter Schweizer’s book, “Throw Them All Out,” first caught the attention of 60 Minutes and quickly ignited a firestorm of controversy.

In “Throw Them All Out,” Schweizer detailed numerous examples of congressional corruption, including our lawmakers’ habit of legislating themselves exclusive loopholes to profit off of the rules and regulations they shackle the rest of us with. That includes insider trading.

Let me explain…

Insider trading, at its very basic, is when somebody with special knowledge about a company decides to either buy or sell shares or security of said company. Usually this is somebody high up on the corporate ladder but, as Briefing Investor explains it, it can also include “officers and directors of companies, owners of restricted stock, and owners of more than 10% of a company’s stock.”

What’s wrong with that, you might ask?

Well, that’s where things start to get a bit more complicated.

You see, when the stock market crashed in 1929, setting off the Great Depression, a lot of blame started flying around pretty quickly as blame usually does. And while the government was in part responsible for the mess and definitely for the ensuing chaos, it didn’t want to acknowledge that blatant fact.

So, for better or worse, it began meddling in the private sector more than it already had been.

In 1934, Congress passed the Securities Exchange Act, which was promptly signed by President Franklin Delanor Roosevelt. Arguably the first of its kind – at least on the federal level – it placed strict controls on publicly traded companies with the stated intention of evening the playing field against the “fat cats” on Wall Street and in favor of main street.

Among the long list of regulations the Securities Exchange Act outlawed were:

• Using any “device, scheme, or artifice to defraud,” investors, essentially requiring companies to list all relevant information about their businesses, profits, etc. or, as Cornell University Law School explains it, anything “that investors would think was important to their decision to buy or sell the stock”
• Manipulating the market to suggest that stocks are worth more than they actually are
• Employee purchases or sales of ownership in a company without first making the public aware of the transaction, also known as insider trading

Altogether, the Act was supposed to force companies to behave more ethically and investors to act more intelligently, with the combined result of keeping the markets from crashing again. The same was true for the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which demanded even more transparency from businesses, adding additional paperwork for them to fill out and information they had to release.

Obviously, neither have prevented very much, as evidenced by the multiple stock market crashes and recessions 1934, corporate scandals such as Enron, WorldCom and Satyam, as well as the government-connected Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, corporate crooks such as Bernie Madoff and Jon Corzine, and Raj Rajaratnam and the other 55 people who have been charged with insider trading since 2009.

And those are just the ones who get caught!

That also isn’t to mention that company’s are really quite clever about following the letter of the law rather than the spirit much of the time. (Though it’s hard to blame them sometimes when they have to follow so many of said laws.)

As Cornell University explains:

Section 9 of the 1934 Securities Exchange Act “addresses manipulation of the stock market by traders… However, modern market manipulation is accomplished through methods that are more subtle and harder to detect… [partially because] investors must prove that the price was actually affected by the manipulation, and that the defendant acted willfully. Proving damages also involves proving the actual value, since successful claimants may recover the difference between the actual value and the price they paid.”

And the same can be said of many other aspects of insider trading law, as discussed further on.

Their Insider Pain Can Be Your Outsider Gain

Regardless of whether either the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 were right or wrong, helpful or harmful, effective or ineffective, or even selfishly or selflessly motivated, they are the reality that the publicly-traded business world has to operate under in the United States.

As the aforementioned “Throw Them All Out” by Peter Schweizer pointed out, Congress doesn’t have to abide by any such rules since they loopholed themselves right out of any such responsibility or accountability, but that’s another topic for another article.

In the meantime, average investors can get ahead of the game if they only have the know-how and commitment to utilize their resources properly. (For anybody who doesn’t have the time or inclination to not only look into the following resources but follow them up and research the company as well, consider Alex Green’s Insider Alert, which does all of that work for you. For more information about the Oxford Club service, click here.)

Unless you want to get into the world of shorting stocks, forget paying that much attention to when insiders are selling. Partially that’s because there are at least a dozen good reasons for company employers or head honchos to sell what they have. And most of them are personal, having nothing to do with the company’s short-term, mid-term or long-term growth.

The chief financial officer might have a daughter going off to college, the CEO might be buying a new house, or the vice president’s young son might require a costly medical treatment. And an easy way for any of them to get the finances necessary for any of those purchases is by selling off some of their shares.

Now, if the CFO, CEO and VP are all selling at the same time, that’s reason to think twice about investing in the company. But if it’s just one or even two corporate insiders offloading some shares, more than likely, it isn’t in any danger of becoming the next Lehman Brothers.

On the other hand, there is only one reason that insiders buy, and that is that they expect their company to do well in the near future. And, let’s face it: Out of all of the analysts, investors and industry experts who like to spout their opinions at every opportunity, it’s the insiders who should know the best how their company is really doing and what it is really capable of accomplishing.

Back in 2009, Alexander Green, who edits the Insider Alert, wrote how, in 2008, he discovered that:

“David Abrams, a Director of Crown Castle International made the single-largest insider purchase in the nation. He bought 4.5 million shares at a cost of more than $60 million.

“Based in Houston, Crown Castle leases cell towers and antenna space to wireless communications companies. Most of these are in the United States, although more than 1,400 are in Australia.

• The company has more than 24,000 towers in prime markets and is actively building more to lease.
• Recent earnings, released earlier in the month, contained a few surprises.
• While earnings were in the red, revenue was still growing at 9%. And I noticed that site rental revenue, gross margins and recurring cash flow all exceeded expectations.
• Moreover, the company had lost three-quarters of its market value and was selling below book value.”

Triggered by the SEC filings that Abrams legally had to file within two days of his purchase, Alex was able to identify it as a potential growth stock worth targeting. But he didn’t stop there, taking the additional necessary step of researching the company from what it did to how and how well it did it.

Then he recommended Crown Castle International to his Insider Alert subscribers and he watched it.

Of course, the markets weren’t behaving well in 2008. At all. Yet two months later, the stock had shot up 58%. And Alex was able to lead subscribers to that significant short-term gain all because he was paying attention to what the insiders were doing.

Insider Activity Isn’t So Easy to Find

As previously mentioned, while insider trading can prove extremely lucrative, it isn’t always the easiest task to interpret or even find.

For starters, the SEC – in typical governmental fashion – doesn’t just have one generic form for insiders to fill out whenever they’re making a transaction. They have multiple ones, including:

• Form 3 filings, which officially record how much an insider owns
• Form 4 filings, which officially record any changes to what an insider owns
• Form 5 filings, which basically sum up everything recorded in Form 4 filings for the year
• Form 13D filings, which have to be filled out as soon as a shareholder owns 5% or more of a company’s shares or securities
• Form 144 filings, which officially record the POSSIBLE sale of what an insider owns (No sale actually has to be made, so someone like a CEO can just keep filing Form 144s every 90 days just in case he does want to someday sell something.)

Starting to get the picture?

And it gets even more complicated than that…

As Briefing Investor says: “Unfortunately, even if you could access all insider filings electronically as an Internet investor [which you can’t, considering that much of the data doesn’t ever have to make it onto the internet or any traditional news source either], the time requirements on these forms does not always prove helpful. Form 144s must be filed in advance of the actual sale, but it may be done as early as the morning of the sale.”

In other words: not helpful at all. The same goes for Form 4 filings, which are submitted to the SEC after any changes are made, not before or even during.

Any savvy businessperson or anybody with access to a decent legal advisor can easily get around the rules and regulations – though not the paperwork – to profit just about as nicely as he or she would if the government didn’t meddle as much as it does.

Clearly, researching insider trading with the intent of capitalizing on it can easily become a complicated and unhelpful mess for anybody who doesn’t know exactly what they’re doing or at least knows somebody who does.

But for those who can successfully navigate the complicated, convoluted world of insider trading, there’s major money to be had.

The Great Minds of the Market: Charles Dow

The Great Minds of the Market:
Charles Dow

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 23, 2012: Issue #1692

This week I’m beginning a series about the great men and women – often unknown – who shaped the modern investment landscape.

Why should you care about these individuals, especially since many of them are dead? Because Sir Francis Bacon was right: Knowledge is power. This is especially true in the financial markets. And, as you’re about to learn, the type of knowledge you accumulate is likely to be a primary determinant of your success as an investor.

So let’s kick things off today with a man whose name is legendary on Wall Street:

Charles Dow.

Dow is a significant figure in the annals of financial history for two reasons. He created the first financial bible, The Wall Street Journal, and the first market barometer, the Dow Jones Industrial Average. In doing so, he revolutionized the way we talk about the financial markets.

(By the way, Charles Dow is sometimes credited with creating Dow Theory, too. This is not so. The market-timing strategy was extracted fom his WSJ editorials 20 years after his death by a market technician named William P. Hamilton.)

Charles Dow founded Dow Jones and Company with a partner in New York in 1882. At the time, most financial data was simply outdated news and unreliable gossip. But Dow Jones and Company published daily financial updates in a two-page newspaper called the Customers’ Afternoon Letter – The Wall Street Journal’s predecessor.

It was in the Letter that Dow first published his average, initially comprised of 14 companies – 12 railroads and two industrials.

Today the Dow consists of 30 large companies meant to reflect the U.S. economy. (There are, however, few holdings in heavy industry – and no railroads!) The average, price-weighted to compensate for stock splits and other adjustments, is the most closely watched benchmark for tracking stock market activity.

Yet the Dow is actually a poor representation of the broad market. If you’re looking to capture its performance, you’re much better off owning the better-diversified S&P 500 (NYSE: SPY) or the Wilshire 5000 (NYSE: TMW).

The most important thing we can learn from Charles Dow is the primacy of financial information. More than a hundred years ago, he realized that it was essential for investors to have not just opinions, rumors and forecasts, but verifiable facts. You simply must be well informed and up-to-date beyond this week’s headlines.

I’ve known investors who will buy a stock and not keep abreast of how the company is performing relative to its competitors, the direction of sales, or even the growth in profits. This is an act of faith, not rational investing.

Charles Dow created a daily business publication to give investors essential facts. Today, of course, you can get your financial news in real time off the internet. But the important data isn’t today’s government statistics or a new pronouncement by Ben Bernanke, but rather the hard numbers that tell us how individual businesses are performing.

The kind of investment news you accumulate is crucial. Listen to economic analysts, for example, and you’ll hear gloom and doom about high unemployment, the housing slump, consumer confidence, or problems in the Eurozone.

Listen to market analysts and you’ll hear trivia about short-term trends, changes in volume, support and resistance levels, and so on. This is not the type of information that will not make you rich.

But listen to business analysts today and you’ll hear plenty about corporate innovations, new medicines and technologies, and, not incidentally, all-time record corporate profits.

Is it any great surprise that investors who follow business news are making a lot of money in this market and those who listen to economic and market forecasts are sitting on their hands and earning miniscule returns?

Charles Dow knew better. And you should, too.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Why Most of the Investment Advice You’ve Heard is Wrong

Why Most of the Investment Advice You’ve Heard is Wrong

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, January 20, 2012: Issue #1691

A conversation with a friend last week sounded numbingly familiar.

“I just can’t seem to win for losing in the stock market,” he confessed. “Five years ago, my broker had me fully invested in stocks and I took a drubbing. Then when things were bottoming out a couple years later, he talked me into making my portfolio more conservative. As a result, I didn’t get much of a pop on the rebound. Now he’s trying to get me to reshuffle again. But I’m too scared to do anything.”

Since he was a friend, I felt obliged to tell him the truth: He’s getting lousy investment advice. Not because his broker failed to outguess the market… but because he’s guessing at all. As if that wasn’t bad enough, there’s a good chance that the advice he’s getting is tainted by self-interest.

Here’s what I mean…

It still astonishes me that the vast majority of investors – even ones who have been active for decades – still don’t understand that stock market success has nothing to do with figuring out the economy.

Look back at history. There’s no correlation between economic growth and stock market performance from year to year. Equities routinely plunge during the good times and rally during the bad. If you know this – and truly understand it – why would you invest your money based on someone’s economic forecast?

The same is true of market timing. It’s easy to look in the rearview mirror and see when you should have been in the market and when you should have been out. But when you look ahead, it is always a blank slate. No guru or trading system can change that.

Even if you could somehow divine what the stock market was going to do next – which you can’t – you still wouldn’t know which stocks would outperform and which ones would lag.

The only way to determine that is to look at business fundamentals. Companies that are doing all the right things – increasing sales, compounding earnings at high rates, growing market share, improving operating margins, paying down debt, buying back shares – will post superb returns, regardless of what the economy or stock market are doing. And those that are doing the opposite – experiencing flat or negative sales, lackluster earnings growth, small margins, high interest costs and diluting existing shareholders with new stock issues – will be laggards.

In short, stock market success is about analyzing businesses not investing in some self-styled expert’s macroeconomic forecast. Yet that’s exactly what the mass media and much of the investment advisory industry encourages people to do every day.

The media does it to attract viewers – and thus advertisers. The advisory industry does it sometimes out of ignorance but often just to justify its fees. This is especially true when you have a transaction-based relationship with an advisor where the more you trade the better he or she is compensated. Trust me. That doesn’t generate satisfactory long-term returns.

Every time you hear a pundit talk about “the new normal,” the rally just ahead or the prolonged economic slump we’re likely to endure, understand that you’re listening to opinions that are no more helpful than a weather forecast for three weeks from Sunday.

Both pieces of advice are worthless. But one is a lot more expensive – and harmful – than the other.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green