Is Your Investment Advisor Capitalizing on Your Fear?

Is Your Investment Advisor Capitalizing on Your Fear?

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist

Monday, January 16, 2012: Issue #1687

Make no mistake. Investors are petrified right now. And they’re telling their investment advisors about it.

The question is: “What is he or she doing in response?” If the answer is adjusting your asset allocation, focusing on your long-term investment goals, or doing a bit of handholding, you probably have a good one.

But if they’re preying on your emotional state with unsuitable investments or all-or-nothing advice, beware.

The story is as old as equity investing itself. When times are good, investors get complacent, take too much risk and generally regret it. When times are bad, investors become anxiety-ridden, take too little risk and generally regret it. Seasoned advisors know this and try to keep you on the right track. But less knowledgeable or less scrupulous advisors may try to take advantage of your worries.

For instance, your investment advisor may recommend that you load up on variable annuities in this uncertain environment. Not a good idea. Some annuities are right for some people. They offer tax-deferred compounding (like an IRA) and a principal guarantee. But the typical annuity is ridiculously expensive, offers mediocre insurance coverage, restricts your investment choices to so-so mutual funds, lacks liquidity and comes with enormous surrender penalties.

Too many investors learn these things about annuities after they’ve plunked for one. Hence, you’ll often hear investors complain that they are “stuck in an annuity” for several years. Investigate these insurance contracts before you invest. On the whole they are oversold, frequently misrepresented and completely inappropriate for many folks.

Another sign that you have a misguided (or unethical) investment advisor is if he suggests that you abandon proven investment principles. For example, if your investment plan is based on a broker’s economic forecast or market timing advice, good luck. You’re going to need it.

No one can accurately predict the economy with any consistency. And it wouldn’t really matter if they could. Stocks routinely rally during the bad times and sell-off during the good ones. If your investment advisor doesn’t know this, you shouldn’t be using her. If she does and is still trying to convince you to flee the market, that’s even worse.

Also beware investment advisors who are paid on a transaction basis and therefore have an incentive for you to trade more frequently. Some brokers today are telling their clients that the old rules no longer apply, that you need to jump in and out of the market and from stock to stock. For a commission-based broker, this can be entirely self-serving advice. And it is almost certain to end badly… at least for the client.

I know it’s tough to buy – or just hang in there – when the outlook is dark. But look back at history. The market was a screaming “Buy” after the crash of ’87, the bear market of 1990, the tech wreck of 1994, the Asian Contagion of 1997, the 2000 to 2002 bear market, and even during the depths of the financial crisis in 2008.

If you’re using an advisor who insists that “this time it’s different,” you might reasonably examine his experience, his ethics and his disciplinary history. And seek out more-qualified advice.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Why the Gold Slump is Not Over

Why the Gold Slump is Not Over

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 09, 2012: Issue #1682

Not long ago, my colleague Mark Skousen asked a roomful of attendees at an investment conference how many of them owned gold. Virtually every hand in the room went up.

“And how many of you have ever sold any of your gold?”

Virtually every hand in the room came down.

For many investors, gold is their “forever investment,” the one asset they never plan to sell. That could be a mistake, a big one.

I can assure you that the institutional investors who have bid gold up the last few years consider the metal a “hot date,” not a long-term marriage. And that bodes ill for prices in the short to medium term.

Yes, I was bearish on gold a year ago. But I’m more bearish on it today. After all, the trend is your friend.

True, gold went up in the first half of 2011 and didn’t peak until August. But take a look at a five-month chart.

It’s not a pretty picture.

Of course, gold is hard to value under the best of circumstances. It has very few industrial uses. It generates no earnings, pays no dividends, accrues no interest and provides no rental income. That means the best any of us can do is guess where it’s headed next.

So why am I guessing it will be lower? Let me count the ways:

1. Gold is a wonderful inflation hedge. But the metal is up more than five-fold over the last 12 years and inflation is still not a problem. Is it not conceivable that inflation could tick up and gold – having already discounted this – moves lower?

2. Gold is a great performer in an economic crisis. But we already had the crisis. It ended in 2008. Things are getting slowly better, not worse.

3. With gold prices still in the stratosphere and the value of the rupee falling, India – the world’s biggest consumer of gold – is likely to experience a pronounced drop-off in demand this year. Not good.

4. Gold is now well above the marginal cost of production. New mines are opening and old mines are re-opening. It’s Economics 101. Greater supply depresses prices.

5. If you believe the gargantuan debt load that Washington has run up will cause gold to rally from here, you may want to think again. Japan’s debt load as a percentage of GDP is more than twice ours and the end result has been disinflation, not inflation. Why will it be different this time? Indeed, George Soros and several other major speculators are openly forecasting outright deflation. That would not be good for gold.

6. Note that while gold ended the year up in 2011, gold shares dropped 16%. Already, equity investors are taking a dim view of the sustainability of gold’s advance. I think they’re right.

7. Investment demand for gold has soared in recent years. Seven years ago, it made up just 16% of total demand. Today it’s more than 40%. But hedge fund managers who piled into gold, unlike Mom and Pop, have no emotional commitment to the metal. These are hair-trigger traders. When the primary trend turns unequivocally south, you can bet these guys will dump gold faster than a freshman girlfriend.

I’m not suggesting that anyone bail out of gold. You should hold at least 5% of your liquid assets in gold and gold stocks, and perhaps more. But if you’re one of those folks I meet who has 30%, 50% … even 80% in the barbarous relic, you’re really sitting at the roulette table at 3 AM.

No one can say unequivocally that the bet won’t pay off. But there could be a steep price to pay if it doesn’t. The last time gold was a bubble, investors were down more than 60% two decades later.

As Mark Twain said, “History may not repeat itself. But it rhymes.”

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

The Best Buy Signal of 2012

The Best Buy Signal of 2012

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 02, 2012: Issue #1677

Investors are scared right now and it’s not hard to see why.

Economic growth is anemic. Unemployment is high. Banks are saddled with toxic assets. Problems in the Eurozone continue to fester. Residential real estate is sinking in a mire of short sales and foreclosures. And both federal and state governments – not to mention consumers themselves – are drowning in a sea of red ink.

We have all heard these negatives repeated daily and cycled endlessly in the national media.

However, these reports often leave out or play down the good news: Inflation is low. Short-term rates are near zero. Energy and food prices are declining. Emerging market economies – which are end markets for the developed world – are still booming. Corporate profits are at an all-time record – and have been for seven quarters now. And stock valuations are low. (The S&P 500 has historically traded at an average of 16 times earnings. Today it’s less than 14 times earnings.)

Last year I shared another key insight with you. It has always been a positive indicator for stocks when the Dow yields more than Treasury bonds.

This makes sense when you think about it. Shares are riskier than bonds. Investors should demand a higher yield. Yet almost never since 1958 have stocks yielded more than Treasuries. Today they do, however. The 10-year bond yields just two percent. The Dow yields 30 percent more.

If you’re still not convinced that equities are a good place to be in 2012, let me draw your attention to one of the strongest indicators of all…

Contrarian Investing Works

It’s a truism that no one consistently predicts the stock market. (That’s why money manager and Forbes 400 member Ken Fisher calls it “The Great Humiliator.”) However, there’s a straightforward system that offers a reasonable prospect of timing the market reasonably well in the future.

A 25-year study published last year in The Journal of Financial Economics found that if you had simply invested in the S&P 500 when equity fund flows were negative (redemptions exceeded new investments) and into 90-day Treasury bills when fund flows were positive (new investments exceeded redemptions) you would have substantially outperformed the market while spending nearly half the time in riskless T-bills.

In other words, contrarian investing works. This system would have you do the very inverse of what the great mass of investors is doing. (It turns out they have god-awful instincts, so it pays to buck the consensus.)

Bear in mind, if you’d followed this system, you wouldn’t just have earned higher returns than being fully invested. You would have done it with far less risk, spending nearly half the time in riskless T-bills.

I mention this because the Investment Company Institute recently reported that investors are yanking billions out of equity funds virtually every week and pouring the money into ultra-low-paying money market accounts. The Wall Street Journal further reports that “investors have continued to consistently pull money from U.S. equity funds since August.”

I’m trying to contain my glee. Who says no one rings a bell in the stock market?

The fear and pessimism about both the economy and the stock market are way overdone and fully discounted in current stock prices. If you can’t be stirred by low interest rates, low inflation, low valuations and record profits, you really should ask yourself two important questions:

1. Is logic or emotion governing my decision making about my portfolio?

2. If I don’t invest in stocks – the greatest wealth creator of all time – how am I going to meet my long-term financial goals?

We’ll talk more about these issues in the weeks ahead. But, for the record, I think 2012 will be a good year for the stock market and – although virtually no one expects or believes it – perhaps even a barnburner.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

Why This Market Truism Just Isn’t True

Why This Market Truism Just Isn’t True

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, December 5, 2011: Issue #1657

In my first book, The Gone Fishin’ Portfolio, I made a confession that startled some readers…

I retired from the investment services industry while I was still in my early 40s, but many of my clients had not become financially independent. This was not because I advised them poorly. I dealt with my clients honestly and gave them the best advice and service I could.

Yet, in many ways, they operated at a disadvantage. Some had a poor understanding of investment fundamentals. Others found it impossible to commit to a long-term investment plan. Many were simply too emotional about the markets, running to cash at the first hint of danger.

Contrarian instincts are rare, too, I learned. Few people are emotionally stirred by low stock prices. But every time there was a correction, a crash, or financial panic, my Scottish blood would surge, my pulse would rise, I’d rub my hands together, and start buying.

My clients, on the other hand, often did just the opposite, sometimes because they were too nervous but often because they bought into the old chestnut that a good investor doesn’t buy into a market downturn.

“The trend is your friend,” they’d say. Or “Don’t try to catch a falling knife.” This is surely the conventional wisdom in some quarters, but it’s not particularly wise. Here’s why …

For the last several months, traders have obsessed over problems in the Eurozone and the strength (or perceived weakness) of the U.S. economy. Taking a decidedly downbeat view, the market had a pretty horrendous November. But sentiment can turn on a dime and stocks can put on a furious – and completely unexpected – rally.

If you don’t already own stocks, it’s tough to catch the train after it has left the station.

Yet many gurus, including growth-stock advocate William O’Neill and his widely read publication Investor’s Business Daily, often insist that you shouldn’t but a stock unless the market itself is in a confirmed uptrend.

That may make sense in theory, but it often fails in practice. For instance, on page one each day, that paper reports whether the market is in a confirmed uptrend or downtrend. (And sometimes hedges, using language such as “Uptrend Under Pressure.”)

As we all know, this has been a volatile year for the market with the major indices bouncing up and down repeatedly. But you could hardly have chosen a worse strategy than to wait until the market was in a confirmed uptrend before buying. All that meant was that you bought into every short-term spike and then hit your trailing stops over and over again. (It must feel like banging your head against the wall.)

The Oxford Club has hit a number of its stops this year, too, sometimes protecting profits, other times protecting principal. But by buying great companies when the market was under pressure, we ended up with a lot of attractive entry points and plenty of both realized and unrealized profits.

True, if stocks go into a secular bear market, you can end with losses no matter how well you timed your entry points. However, you can never know whether a market drop is merely a correction or something more ominous until you are looking in the rear-view mirror.

You have to stick your neck out occasionally, pick your spots and buy stocks. If you don’t, what are you going to do? Buy bonds yielding 2.5 percent? Hold a money market paying less than one-tenth of one percent? It’s tough to beat inflation or meet your financial goals that way.

Let me make one thing clear, however. It’s most definitely a mistake to buy a troubled company that’s in a downtrend, no matter which way the broad market is heading. (That only works for those with exceptionally long time horizons – and often not even then.) But buying great companies when the broad market is a downtrend gives you a chance to obtain good prices on fine long-term investments and take advantage of tradable short-term rallies, too.

The next two months are traditionally one of the strongest periods for the stock market. No one can say, of course, whether that tradition will hold. But it’s a reasonable strategy to buy great companies when the market is down.

If your goal is to sell high, you have to start by buying low. And market corrections – like the one we’ve seen lately – give you an excellent opportunity to do just that.

Good investing,

Alexander Green

The Best Trade You Can Make in November

The Best Trade You Can Make in November

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Thursday, November 24, 2011: Issue #1650

In December 1996, I sold some shares of Best Buy (NYSE: BBY) to offset gains elsewhere in my portfolio.

I still consider it the most boneheaded investment move I ever made. A year later, the stock was up more than five-fold. A few years further on, it was up more than thirty-fold.

The worst part is that I didn’t dislike the business prospects for Best Buy at the time. Quite the contrary, in fact. I sold it only because I had substantial capital gains and was cleaning out my portfolio to offset them.

I don’t always do that any more. And you shouldn’t necessarily, either. Despite what your tax advisor may tell you, you should never sell an investment for tax reasons alone. Nor do you have to.

Here’s why…

The IRS allows you to offset realized gains with realized losses each calendar year. If you do, however, you must wait at least 30 days before buying the same shares back. (Otherwise you run afoul of the wash-sale rule.)

Offsetting gains at the end of the year is often a sensible move. Most stocks aren’t appreciably higher 30 days later. And if you still like them, you can buy them back then.

There is a risk, however, and it’s called the January effect. The first month of the year is traditionally a strong one for the market. A lot of pension and IRA money gets invested early each year. Plus, there’s often a rebound from the tax-loss selling that goes on each December.

If a stock you own soars in January, there’s a natural reluctance to buy it back. The temptation is to wait until it comes back down. But what if it doesn’t? You’ve taken a limited loss but sold an investment with unlimited upside potential.

There’s a way around this problem, however. And you can take advantage of it – but only if you’re willing to move this week.

In late November each year, I look at my entire portfolio for any companies that are trading below my entry price but NOT near my trailing stops. If I still like a stock, I often make the decision to double down on it for 30 days.

Why? Because I can sell the original shares at the end of December for a tax loss. And if the stock rallies in January, it’s not a problem. After all, thanks to my purchase in November, I own the same number of shares as I bought originally.

What if you don’t have the cash to double down on your position? Use margin. Again, I’m recommending this only for a 30-day period. Your margin interest charge will be minimal.

The risk, of course, is that your shares will be worth less in late December and you will have a paper loss on the second purchase.

However, just the opposite may happen. Remember, the January effect is often preceded by the Santa Claus rally, the tendency of the stock market to do well in the second half of December. As a result, you could end up with a smaller loss in your original shares and a paper gain on your second purchase.

(The Santa Claus rally is never certain, of course, and another reason why you should only add to those companies whose earnings prospects remain strong.)

Bear in mind, when selling for tax purposes, the IRS requires that you buy those identical shares AT LEAST 30 days before you sell the others. So if you want to use this strategy for 2011, you must act this week.

If we have the traditional mid-December to early February rally, you’ll thank me. And then perhaps again on April 15.

Good investing,

Alexander Green

How to Beat “the Mania of Pessimism”

How to Beat “the Mania of Pessimism”

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, September 12, 2011: Issue #1598

Two weeks ago, I opined that the biggest obstacle a stock market investor faces today is “headline risk.”

That is, relentless media negativity.

The idea seems to be gaining traction. On last week’s “This Week” on ABC, Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist George Will said, “The very least the media should do right now is not detract from the nation’s understanding or add to the synthetic hysteria.”

In the September 17 USA Today, James Paulson, Chief Investment Strategist at Wells Capital Management, said, “We are in the middle of a mania of pessimism. The nation is suffering from “Armageddon hypochondria.”

Again and again, the media reminds us about the weak dollar, high unemployment, the soft housing market, problems in the Euro Zone, political dysfunction in Washington, trouble in the banking sector, and the down-and-out consumer. After a few hours of this, you’d expect to walk outside and see bread lines and angry mobs.

That’s not what you see, however. What you see instead are ordinary people going about their everyday business – and getting bombed periodically with media sensationalism calculated to attract viewers and sell advertising.

It works, too. In fact, it works so well that few people see all the positives that exist today.

“Positives?” a friend asked me the other day, genuinely perplexed.  “What positives?”

Exactly. We’ve gotten to the point where people have had so much downbeat news dripped on them for so long that they can’t even imagine there is a positive side to recent events or that any logical case can be made for owning stocks to meet their financial goals.

So let me take a stab at it now.

For starters, realize that it is not possible for anyone to accurately and consistently predict economic growth or stock market performance. But here’s an insight you can take to the bank: Share prices follow earnings. (Earnings, of course, are the net profits of a business.)

In the third quarter of last year, the companies that make up the S&P 500 reported all-time record earnings. In the fourth quarter, those record earnings were exceeded, as they were again in the first quarter of this year… and yet again in the recently reported second quarter.

If you didn’t hear that we’re in a period of all-time record corporate profits, you really ought to think twice about who’s delivering your newsworthy information. Or at least who’s providing your investment guidance.

As investment legend Peter Lynch once noted, “People have all this data and yet they look at all the wrong things… It’s about earnings. They need to follow the earnings.”

Of course, just because corporate earnings have hit an all-time record four quarters in a row, it doesn’t mean they will continue. And, conversely, it doesn’t mean that they won’t.

If you can’t imagine why stocks would rally from here, just imagine what will happen if the much ballyhooed double-dip doesn’t appear.

• There are plenty of good reasons to be bullish on stocks right now. But if you’re developing your investment perspective from gloom-and-doom media reports, you may not recognize the positive factors. So I’ll tick off four big ones for you now:

• Interest rates are at historic lows and inflation is negligible. That isn’t likely to change any time soon.

• Energy and food prices are moving lower and Ben Bernanke has pledged to hold short-term rates at zero for two more years.

• Valuations are cheap.  When the S&P 500 traded at these levels eleven years ago, it sold for 44 times earnings. But because profits have hit new records lately, the S&P 500 today sells for just 13 times trailing earnings, well below the long-term average of 16.4.

• Investors are anxious and afraid. This may seem like a negative but it’s not. Investor sentiment is an excellent contrarian indicator, especially when accompanied by low valuations. Think back to the market low of March 2008, when the consensus was that the world was coming to an end and the Dow briefly traded below 6,500. From that point the market put on an impressive rally, essentially doubling in two and a half years. As investment pioneer John Templeton rightly said, “Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, peak on optimism and die on euphoria.” Do you know anyone who’s feeling euphoric right now? Not me.

• Mutual fund investors have yanked money out of stocks over the past six weeks. It may seem counter-intuitive but that’s yet another positive. A 25-year study published last year in the Journal of Financial Economics found that if you had simply invested in the S&P 500 when equity fund flows were negative (redemptions exceeded new investments) and into 90-day Treasury bills when fund flows were positive (new investments exceeded redemptions) you would have substantially outperformed the market while spending nearly half the time in riskless T-bills. In other words, it pays to buck the consensus.

Don’t get me wrong. More bad news from the Euro Zone and political wrangling here at home will still push stocks around from day to day. That’s not important. What is important is whether you’re confident – as The Oxford Club is – that the companies you own are set to report dramatically higher profits in the weeks ahead.

You may be reluctant to invest in stocks. I understand. It takes nerve and resolve to go against the trend and invest in times like these. But you should.

FDR was wrong about some things. But he got one big thing right. The only thing you have to fear… is fear itself.

Good investing,

Alexander Green

The Best Buy Signal in 53 Years

The Best Buy Signal in 53 Years

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Thursday, August 25, 2011: Issue #1586

Just weeks before the stock market made a dramatic bottom in early 2009, I wrote an Investment U column entitled “One of The Best Buy Signals in 51 Years.”

It was one of our most widely read columns that year – and syndicated many other places, as well.

I have no idea how many readers acted on my analysis at the time. After all, the financial crisis was in full swing and investor sentiment – to quote Jed Clampett – “was lower than a hog’s jaw on market day.”

But those who bought stocks on this signal made gobs of money in the months that followed. After all, the market essentially doubled between the lows of 2009 to the highs earlier this year.

Now – for only the second time in 53 years – this uncanny signal is flashing again. Here’s what it is and why you should take advantage of one of the best and most accurate signals in stock market history…

Market Yields: Stock vs. U.S. Treasuries

In the first half of the twentieth century, investors found that if you bought stocks only when the market’s yield exceeded the yield on 10-year Treasuries, you would have been in for every single major rally.

The returns were huge – and the system made perfect sense. Stocks are riskier than bonds, market participants reasoned, so they should yield more to compensate for greater volatility and the likelihood of occasional losses.

The system worked like a charm until 1958. Then it stopped cold. Why? Because for the next 50 years, stocks never yielded more than Treasuries.

Public companies began using their cash flow to fund operations and acquisitions rather than paying out dividends to shareholders. With stock yields sharply lower, most analysts reasoned that the indicator was dead, that the yield on stocks would never again top bonds.

And, indeed, it took a full blown financial crisis but two and a half years ago to finally happen again. With the luxury of hindsight, we can see that was yet another superb buying opportunity. And today it’s happening yet again thanks to both the tremendous rally in government bonds and the socking that stocks have undergone. For only the second time since 1958, stocks are yielding more than bonds.

Granted, it’s a squeaker. As I write, the 10-year Treasury is yielding 2.07 percent. The S&P 500 yields 2.16 percent. Of course the S&P 500 Index was only created in 1957. It was the Dow that investors used in the first half of the last century. And the yield on the Dow is more than 50 percent higher at 3.24 percent.

History Says… Stocks Are a Terrific Long-Term Buy

If history is any guide, that means stocks are a terrific long-term “Buy” right now and Treasuries – which have become a complete bubble and a table-pounding “Sell” in my estimation – are due for a long period of underperformance.

True, GDP growth is likely to be anemic in the months ahead. But – shocking and surprising most investors – stocks (and especially dividend-paying stocks) should do exceptionally well.

There are no guarantees in the world of stock market investing, of course. But as Patrick Henry famously said, “I know no way of judging the future but by the past.”

Good investing,

Alexander Green

Editor’s Note: So how can you capitalize on the best buy signal in the last 53 years? As Alex said, it’s important to focus on dividend-paying stocks… And the best way to read Alex’s favorite picks and his regular market commentary is to join The Oxford Club…

I Was Wrong About Gold and Internet Stocks and Real Estate

I Was Wrong About Gold and Internet Stocks and Real Estate

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, August 15, 2011

In the summer of 1999, I warned my friends that they were playing with fire, that the rip-snorting bull market in Internet and technology stocks was likely to end badly.

Most of them scoffed – and were glad they did. After all, Internet stocks weren’t anywhere near a peak in the summer of 1999. I was early. It would be nine long months before the scaffolding began to shake.

I never dreamed the mania could go for so long. But it did. And it taught me a valuable lesson. You can’t make a rational estimate of when irrational behavior will end.

The same thing happened with the housing bubble seven years ago. Almost no one was buying my skeptical take. I talked to realtors who had been in the business their whole lives and had never witnessed anything like the dramatic run-up in prices that was occurring. Yet most managed to convince themselves – and their clients – that prices would only keep rising.

Which they did. Until, of course, they didn’t.

Now we’re in the midst of a spectacular run in gold and silver. When I bump into typical investors at cocktail parties or backyard barbecues, they invariably tell me they are loading up on precious metals. “It’s a no-brainer,” a Merrill Lynch broker told me just last week.

I agree. I think some investors have left their brains with the hat-check girl. Here’s why …

• The price of gold and silver are now way above the marginal cost of production. When that happens, you get new supply. Yes, it takes time but, trust me – it’s coming. (High commodity prices always sow the seeds of their own destruction. Have you checked out agricultural prices lately?)

• Unlike oil, a depleting asset, all the gold ever mined is still around and is available to be sold.  If consumers rush to cash in on higher prices – or (ahem) falling prices – supply can quickly swamp demand.

• Higher inflation does not necessarily portend higher prices for precious metals. Gold hit $850 an ounce in January 1980. Although inflation hit 12.4 percent that year, the yellow metal was $300 an ounce lower in December. That was a 35-percent hit. And yet that was just the beginning of the end. Gold didn’t bottom out until almost 20 years later. Silver took an even more spectacular ride, hitting a high of $48 an ounce in 1980 and losing 90 percent of its value by 1982.

• Or take a look at gold equities.  While the price of the barbarous relic keeps rising, you’ll notice the gold stock index is no longer tagging along. Here’s the chart… Gold has pushed ahead over the last three months. But blue chip gold stocks have fallen, even though most of the big producers have removed their hedges. The smart money is betting that today’s high prices won’t be sustained.

• And how about the smartest money of all? Warren Buffett isn’t buying any nonsense about gold being “undervalued” at current levels. He openly scoffed at the idea in this April clip. And gold is only more expensive now.

Some readers might remind me (and should) that I was bearish on gold several months ago. Yet gold and silver have only pushed on to higher highs. Just as Internet stocks did. Just as residential real estate did. Just as tulip bulbs did.

Don’t get me wrong. Everyone should own some gold as a hedge against economic or political catastrophe. But if you are piling into gold and silver now – or if it makes up a quarter or more of your portfolio – you are truly living in Las Vegas.

I could be wrong, of course. Maybe gold and silver are still in the early stages of a tremendous run-up. But what if I’m not wrong? A 60 year old who jumped into gold in 1980 was down more than 60 percent on his 80^th birthday, if he lived that long. And that’s ignoring inflation, something gold bulls are not traditionally inclined to do.

The truth is no one can tell you where gold will be in a month or a year. Still, it wouldn’t hurt to heed the words of Mark Twain:

“History may not repeat itself. But it rhymes.”

Good investing,

Alexander Green

How Traders and Investors Should Play This Market

How Traders and Investors Should Play This Market

by Alexander Green, Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, August 8, 2011: Issue #1573

You often read in the financial press that stock market investors should do this or short-term traders should do that. But which one are you and what should you be doing now?

Here are my quick and dirty definitions, followed by a few thoughts about how each ought to approach today’s wild and wooly financial markets.

• An investor is someone set on achieving long-term financial goals: a comfortable retirement, the kids’ college education, or perhaps the down payment for a new house. Success here is measured in years, so this week’s market action is largely irrelevant except as it offers unusual opportunities. The important things to consider here are quality, diversification, asset allocation and keeping annual expenses and taxes to a minimum.

• A trader is someone who is trying to beat the market in the short term either to goose returns or reach short-term financial goals. This approach is inherently more risky, as the market action over the last few weeks has made crystal clear. The key here is to own great companies that are likely to post positive surprises in the short term (for example, great sales, high earnings, new product announcements, or an unexpected takeover bid). A trailing stop is essential to protect profits and limit any losses.

For the long-term stock investor, the current sell-off is almost certainly a gift from Fortune. I know, no one you know sees it that way, but look back through history. You’ll find that virtually every widespread market sell-off was a buying opportunity.

Yes, the market can go lower in the short term. (That’s always the case, incidentally.) But over the last 40 years, the S&P 500 has seen 25 corrections of 10 percent during a bull market. In only nine of them did the losses grow to 20 percent or more. Despite all the naysayers, a further sell-off is hardly assured.

One of the Few Reliable Rules of Investing

Still, you should only nibble at great stocks right now, not throw money at them in wild abandon. (Although I’ll bet that’s not your instinct right now, anyway.) One of the few reliable rules of investing is that perceived risk and actual risk are inversely related: The more dangerous the market feels, the more likely it is to produce generous returns in the years ahead.

So long-term investors gradually shift some money out of assets like bonds that have appreciated sharply and move them into stocks which have depreciated sharply. The fact that this feels like the wrong thing to do is, paradoxically, just the confirmation you need. (You need only recall the market meltdown two and a half years ago to see what I mean.)

Short-term traders need to take a slightly different approach, however. If you’ve been using our recommended trailing stops, you almost certainly have been building cash the last few weeks as you protected profits and preserved capital.

Don’t be in any rush to put this cash back to work. To take advantage of a crisis, you don’t have to be the first one to the fire. Pick your spots and trade judiciously. (One good strategy is to buy the same stocks that corporate insiders are currently loading up on.)

Don’t Risk Missing a Significant Rebound

Despite the stormy weather, you should cast a few lines right now. It may be tempting to simply wait until things “settle down” but then you run the risk of missing a significant rebound.

In short, tune out all the end-of-the-world hysteria and think rationally.

• As a long-term investor, shift money in cash and bonds into stocks.

• As a short-term trader – and you may well be both – scoop up great companies selling at unusual discounts – there are plenty of them out there – and adjust your stops to protect your gains.

You’ll thank me when things get back to normal. As they always do eventually.

Good investing,

Alexander Green

Do Trailing Stops Really Work?

Do Trailing Stops Really Work?

by Alexander Green, Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, June 18, 2011: Issue #1558

Editor’s Note: This week Investment U’s Chief Investment Strategist, Alexander Green, is in Seattle for an annual investment conference. Given his priorities to his subscribers, Investment U will be running one of his classic pieces on trailing stops. We hope you enjoy…

Somebody recently told me over lunch that one of the most controversial aspects of our investment policy is trailing stops.

But they shouldn’t be.

If you don’t have a premeditated sell discipline – and the vast majority of investors don’t – you’re flying by the seat of your pants. And that rarely leads to superior investment performance.

But do trailing stops really work?

Survey Says: Use Trailing Stops

In a word: Yes. Trailing stops protect your profits and your trading capital. And there’s much more than just anecdotal evidence.

In a study published in The Journal of Portfolio Management, Christophe Faugere, Hany A. Shawky and David M. Smith – finance professors at the State University of New York at Albany – researched the performance of money managers who oversee pension funds, endowments and high-net-worth accounts.

Because most institutions work under strict investment guidelines, these academics were able to analyze performance based on differing approaches to selling stocks.

The result? Institutional managers who fared best were those with restrictive rules that didn’t allow much leeway for holding stocks for emotional reasons. Managers who relied on “flexible” sell strategies did far worse.

Count me as unsurprised. Institutional money managers are just as prone to rationalizing as individual investors when they make a mistake. (Hence the old Wall Street chestnut, “What does a broker call a trade gone wrong? A long-term investment.”)

Trailing Stops: Providing Protection… Securing Profits

The culprit is almost always pride, ego, or emotion. Without any kind of sell strategy, emotions come into play. And emotions are almost always wrong.

But by adhering to a disciplined trailing stop strategy, our investment system mows down emotion-driven trading errors like a field full of dandelions.

It cures greed. Eliminates fear. And does away with wishful thinking – as in, “I hope this stock turns around and starts going the right way.”

Of course, trailing stops aren’t the only sell discipline out there. But they’re one of the easiest to implement. They serve two purposes…

• They make sure we never let a small loss become an unacceptable loss.
• They keep us from selling stocks while they’re still trending up.

Maneuver Past the Market Makers With TradeStops.com

The one knock against using trailing stops is that unscrupulous market makers will sometimes take out your stop order right before a stock takes off.

But Richard Smith, President and Founder of TradeStops.com – and a PhD in mathematics – has a service that provides an ingenious solution.

If you visit www.tradestops.com, you can enter the stocks you own, the price you paid and the percentage trailing stop you want to use. There are several valuable benefits…

• If any of your stocks close beneath your selected stop, TradeStops sends a message – to your cell phone, e-mail, or account page – alerting you.
• Some brokerage firms, like Fidelity, offer trailing stop alerts with their accounts. But they generally expire after 30 or 60 days. TradeStops information never expires and even offers a 30-day risk-free trial.
• You can track up to 50 stocks at a time. (And whenever you stop out of one, you can replace it with another.)
• TradeStops is easy to use. It’s specifically designed for technophobes.
• It’s reasonably priced. There are additional services available for dedicated short-term traders who want even more.

It’s important to note that TradeStops notifies you of stops, not your broker. And it doesn’t enter sell orders. But the key is to make sure you have an acknowledged point where you’d be willing to sell any individual stock.

Trailing stops don’t just offer to cut your losses and protect your profits. They guarantee it.

Good investing,

Alexander Green