The U.S. Aging Crisis: A Threat to Stock Market Prices?

The U.S. Aging Crisis: A Threat to Stock Market Prices?
by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Friday, March 9, 2012: Issue #1726

Robert Arnott claims that the U.S. aging crisis is a threat to future stock market prices. But do the numbers add up?

There’s a new scaremonger in town. And his name is Robert D. Arnott, a portfolio manager, asset-manager executive and Chairman of Research Affiliates in Newport Beach, California.

Mr. Arnott has a simple thesis. Over the next 10 years, the ratio of retirees to active workers will balloon. Retirees, of course, must eventually sell their stocks to support themselves. But there will be fewer young investors around to buy them. Ergo, returns on stocks over the next 10 to 20 years will be anemic.

If this sounds simplistic, congratulations. You probably have a brain and at least a modicum of common sense. This type of “stock market analysis” is really no analysis at all. More to the point, it doesn’t work. Just ask failed economic futurist Harry Dent, whom I’ve written about before.

While it’s inevitable that there will be 10 new senior citizens for each new working-age citizen over the next decade, that in itself doesn’t portend paltry equity returns.

For starters, let’s look at what’s happening to the world population as a whole. There are currently seven billion human beings living on the planet. At the current growth rate, that total is likely to hit eight billion within a decade.

Now, if you believe that investors in China, India, Brazil and other countries will have no interest in buying companies like Procter & Gamble (NYSE: PG), ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), or Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO) in the future, no matter how inexpensively they’re priced, I guess you might put some credence in Mr. Arnott’s thesis.

But that’s highly unlikely. Citizens of capitalist countries are getting wealthier and better educated all the time. And the world is becoming more integrated. Would you really have a problem buying shares of Toyota (NYSE: TM), British Petroleum (NYSE: BP) or Nestle (OTC: NSRGY.PK) if they were bargains?

Of course not, regardless of the demographic trends in Japan, Britain, or Switzerland.

Mr. Arnott doesn’t just miss the big picture about the future, however. He also misinterprets the past. In a recent Wall Street Journal interview, for example, he talks about the collapse of Japan’s stock market over the last 23 years and blames it on the country’s aging population.

I have a better explanation. When the Nikkei 225, Japan’s leading stock market benchmark, climbed to nearly 40,000 in 1989, it was a bubble of epic proportions. Many stocks traded at more than 100 times earnings. And real estate was even more absurd. Just the 1.32 square miles that encompassed the Imperial Palace in Tokyo were valued at more than all the real estate in California combined.

Now that’s nuts. Crazier still were the Japanese banks that loaned money against these wildly inflated property values. This led to a protracted banking crisis that Japan’s political class refused to clean up.

To imagine that the two deflationary decades that followed this mania were the result of an aging population is like blaming this year’s warm winter on your aching big toe. Yet Arnott insists we should hunker down since “[Japan’s] demography is 10 years ahead of ours.”

Want to know what will really determine stock prices in the future? Earnings. I challenge you to look back through history and find even one publicly traded company that increased its profits quarter after quarter, year after year, and the stock didn’t tag along.

Perhaps our aging retirees will buy less in the future and contribute less to U.S. corporate profits. But there are billions of consumers around the world hungering for homes, computers, cars, phones, health insurance, credit cards, pharmaceuticals and golf clubs. They’re likely to be an engine of world economic growth – and rising U.S. corporate profits – for decades to come.

Don’t let anyone scare you otherwise.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green

The Great Minds of the Market: Charles Dow

The Great Minds of the Market:
Charles Dow

by Alexander Green, Investment U Chief Investment Strategist
Monday, January 23, 2012: Issue #1692

This week I’m beginning a series about the great men and women – often unknown – who shaped the modern investment landscape.

Why should you care about these individuals, especially since many of them are dead? Because Sir Francis Bacon was right: Knowledge is power. This is especially true in the financial markets. And, as you’re about to learn, the type of knowledge you accumulate is likely to be a primary determinant of your success as an investor.

So let’s kick things off today with a man whose name is legendary on Wall Street:

Charles Dow.

Dow is a significant figure in the annals of financial history for two reasons. He created the first financial bible, The Wall Street Journal, and the first market barometer, the Dow Jones Industrial Average. In doing so, he revolutionized the way we talk about the financial markets.

(By the way, Charles Dow is sometimes credited with creating Dow Theory, too. This is not so. The market-timing strategy was extracted fom his WSJ editorials 20 years after his death by a market technician named William P. Hamilton.)

Charles Dow founded Dow Jones and Company with a partner in New York in 1882. At the time, most financial data was simply outdated news and unreliable gossip. But Dow Jones and Company published daily financial updates in a two-page newspaper called the Customers’ Afternoon Letter – The Wall Street Journal’s predecessor.

It was in the Letter that Dow first published his average, initially comprised of 14 companies – 12 railroads and two industrials.

Today the Dow consists of 30 large companies meant to reflect the U.S. economy. (There are, however, few holdings in heavy industry – and no railroads!) The average, price-weighted to compensate for stock splits and other adjustments, is the most closely watched benchmark for tracking stock market activity.

Yet the Dow is actually a poor representation of the broad market. If you’re looking to capture its performance, you’re much better off owning the better-diversified S&P 500 (NYSE: SPY) or the Wilshire 5000 (NYSE: TMW).

The most important thing we can learn from Charles Dow is the primacy of financial information. More than a hundred years ago, he realized that it was essential for investors to have not just opinions, rumors and forecasts, but verifiable facts. You simply must be well informed and up-to-date beyond this week’s headlines.

I’ve known investors who will buy a stock and not keep abreast of how the company is performing relative to its competitors, the direction of sales, or even the growth in profits. This is an act of faith, not rational investing.

Charles Dow created a daily business publication to give investors essential facts. Today, of course, you can get your financial news in real time off the internet. But the important data isn’t today’s government statistics or a new pronouncement by Ben Bernanke, but rather the hard numbers that tell us how individual businesses are performing.

The kind of investment news you accumulate is crucial. Listen to economic analysts, for example, and you’ll hear gloom and doom about high unemployment, the housing slump, consumer confidence, or problems in the Eurozone.

Listen to market analysts and you’ll hear trivia about short-term trends, changes in volume, support and resistance levels, and so on. This is not the type of information that will not make you rich.

But listen to business analysts today and you’ll hear plenty about corporate innovations, new medicines and technologies, and, not incidentally, all-time record corporate profits.

Is it any great surprise that investors who follow business news are making a lot of money in this market and those who listen to economic and market forecasts are sitting on their hands and earning miniscule returns?

Charles Dow knew better. And you should, too.

Good Investing,

Alexander Green